Re: The TEXT/HTML Content Type in e-mail

<Larry Masinter expressed concern that the "disposition" semantics
might not preserve the address space in which relative URLs were written.>

If one uses disposition-based URLs only for those MIME parts
which lack a valid global URL, this is not a problem.  It is
possible to define these trumped-up file positions so that
their URLs are valid after the disposition.

Al Gilman

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: The TEXT/HTML Content Type in e-mail, (continued) Re: The TEXT/HTML Content Type in e-mail, Jacob Palme Re: The TEXT/HTML Content Type in e-mail, Al Gilman Content-Where? and caching, Ed Levinson Re: The TEXT/HTML Content Type in e-mail, Jacob Palme Re: The TEXT/HTML Content Type in e-mail, Jacob Palme Re: The TEXT/HTML Content Type in e-mail, Ed Levinson Re: The TEXT/HTML Content Type in e-mail, Jacob Palme Re: The TEXT/HTML Content Type in e-mail, Ed Levinson Re: The TEXT/HTML Content Type in e-mail, Jacob Palme Re: The TEXT/HTML Content Type in e-mail, Larry Masinter Re: The TEXT/HTML Content Type in e-mail, Al Gilman <= Re: The TEXT/HTML Content Type in e-mail, Ed Levinson Re: The TEXT/HTML Content Type in e-mail, Keith Moore Re: The TEXT/HTML Content Type in e-mail, Al Gilman Re: The TEXT/HTML Content Type in e-mail, Jacob Palme Let the header name be "Location:", Al Gilman Re: Let the header name be "Location:", Ned Freed Re: Let the header name be "Location:", Al Gilman Re: Let the header name be "Location:", Ned Freed Re: Let the header name be "Location:", Roy T. Fielding Re: Let the header name be "Location:", Ned Freed