IETF 822 (date)

IETF 822 (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

December 31, 2002

Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey, 20:12
Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Lawrence Greenfield, 10:35
Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey, 10:15

December 30, 2002

Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Keith Moore, 14:47
Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Lawrence Greenfield, 14:16
Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Charles Lindsey, 13:30
Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey, 13:30
Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey, 10:16

December 27, 2002

Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 16:08
Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Russ Allbery, 14:31
Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 14:03
Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Russ Allbery, 13:36
Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 13:10

December 25, 2002

Re: Domains to try in double bounce processing., Keith Moore, 21:07
Domains to try in double bounce processing., Leo Bicknell, 18:36
Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Kai Henningsen, 17:34

December 24, 2002

Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Russ Allbery, 16:05
Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Lawrence Greenfield, 15:54
Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Russ Allbery, 12:14
Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Russ Allbery, 12:10
Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Bruce Lilly, 10:43
Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly, 09:52
Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly, 09:37
Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Pete Resnick, 07:28
Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Bruce Lilly, 07:06

December 23, 2002

Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Russ Allbery, 20:30
Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey, 20:14
Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Charles Lindsey, 20:13

December 22, 2002

Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly, 02:41

December 21, 2002

Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Marc Mutz, 10:09

December 20, 2002

Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Bruce Lilly, 16:45
RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey, 14:36

December 19, 2002

Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Bruce Lilly, 23:20
Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Keith Moore, 21:51
Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Bruce Lilly, 21:46
Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Charles Lindsey, 14:22
Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Charles Lindsey, 14:22
Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Keith Moore, 10:40
Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Bruce Lilly, 10:34
Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Philip Hazel, 02:06

December 18, 2002

Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Keith Moore, 12:03
Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Bruce Lilly, 11:29
Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Alan Barrett, 11:13
Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Alan Barrett, 11:03
Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Keith Moore, 10:56
Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, ned+ietf-822, 10:30
Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Bruce Lilly, 10:23
Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Alan Barrett, 09:09
Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Keith Moore, 09:01
Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Alan Barrett, 08:37
Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Keith Moore, 07:36
Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Alan Barrett, 02:58

December 17, 2002

Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Bruce Lilly, 11:28
Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Charles Lindsey, 05:12

December 13, 2002

Re: The sad state of MIME non-compliance, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder, 14:56
Re: RFC2231 encoding in parameters., Bruce Lilly, 11:19
The sad state of MIME non-compliance, Bruce Lilly, 11:00
Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Bruce Lilly, 10:25