IETF 822 (thread)

Domains to try in double bounce processing., Leo Bicknell, 2002/12/25
- Re: Domains to try in double bounce processing., Keith Moore, 2002/12/25
RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey, 2002/12/20
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly, 2002/12/22
  - Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey, 2002/12/23
    - Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Russ Allbery, 2002/12/23
    - Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly, 2002/12/24
    - Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Russ Allbery, 2002/12/24
    - Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly, 2002/12/24
    - Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Russ Allbery, 2002/12/24
    - Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Lawrence Greenfield, 2002/12/24
    - Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Russ Allbery, 2002/12/24
    - Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Kai Henningsen, 2002/12/25
    - Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2002/12/27
    - Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Russ Allbery, 2002/12/27
    - Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2002/12/27
    - Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Russ Allbery, 2002/12/27
    - Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2002/12/27
    - Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey, 2002/12/30
    - Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Lawrence Greenfield, 2002/12/30
    - Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey, 2002/12/31
    - Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Keith Moore, 2002/12/30
    - Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey, 2002/12/31
    - Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Lawrence Greenfield, 2002/12/31
    - Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey, 2002/12/30
Re: RFC2231 encoding in parameters., Bruce Lilly, 2002/12/13
The sad state of MIME non-compliance, Bruce Lilly, 2002/12/13
- Re: The sad state of MIME non-compliance, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder, 2002/12/13
Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Bruce Lilly, 2002/12/13
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Charles Lindsey, 2002/12/17
  - Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Bruce Lilly, 2002/12/17
    - Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Alan Barrett, 2002/12/18
    - Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Keith Moore, 2002/12/18
    - Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Alan Barrett, 2002/12/18
    - Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Keith Moore, 2002/12/18
    - Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Alan Barrett, 2002/12/18
    - Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, ned+ietf-822, 2002/12/18
    - Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Alan Barrett, 2002/12/18
    - Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Bruce Lilly, 2002/12/18
    - Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Keith Moore, 2002/12/18
    - Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Bruce Lilly, 2002/12/19
    - Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Keith Moore, 2002/12/19
    - Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Bruce Lilly, 2002/12/19
    - Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Keith Moore, 2002/12/19
    - Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Bruce Lilly, 2002/12/19
    - Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Charles Lindsey, 2002/12/19
    - Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Bruce Lilly, 2002/12/18
    - Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Keith Moore, 2002/12/18
    - Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Philip Hazel, 2002/12/19
    - Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Alan Barrett, 2002/12/18
    - Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Charles Lindsey, 2002/12/19
    - Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Bruce Lilly, 2002/12/20
    - Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Marc Mutz, 2002/12/21
    - Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Charles Lindsey, 2002/12/23
    - Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Bruce Lilly, 2002/12/24
    - Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Pete Resnick, 2002/12/24
    - Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Bruce Lilly, 2002/12/24
    - Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047, Charles Lindsey, 2002/12/30