ietf-822
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard

2004-08-30 10:49:52

In <20040829203841(_dot_)76170(_dot_)qmail(_at_)cr(_dot_)yp(_dot_)to> "D. J. 
Bernstein" <djb(_at_)cr(_dot_)yp(_dot_)to> writes:

Charles Lindsey writes:
you find it has been corrupted by all the '>' stuffing

Certainly the old mboxo format should be nuked---but there are other
mbox variants that don't corrupt messages.

The mboxrd format inserts ">" in front of any line beginning "From ",
">From ", ">>From", etc., and then inserts a "From " line at the top.
This is trivially reversible. Readers recognize "From " as the start of
a new message; readers strip ">" from ">From ", ">>From ", etc.

Yes, that is fine so long as you know that you are dealing with an mboxrd,
but in general you don't. Which is why the application/mbox type needs
parameters so that this information can be given (in cases where the
sender know it, of course).

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133   Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, 
CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>