IETF 822 (date)
August 31, 2004
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Bruce Lilly, 16:41
- Re: the most obvious failure in To-NoReply, Keith Moore, 12:51
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 12:33
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 12:30
- Re: reply problem list, Bruce Lilly, 09:46
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Charles Lindsey, 06:40
- Re: the most obvious failure in To-NoReply, Charles Lindsey, 06:40
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Simon Josefsson, 02:00
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Simon Josefsson, 01:51
August 30, 2004
- Re: The job of an MSA, ned+ietf-822, 19:01
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 16:43
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Bruce Lilly, 16:34
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Bruce Lilly, 16:28
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Bill McQuillan, 15:10
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Nathaniel Borenstein, 14:03
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Simon Josefsson, 13:49
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 13:12
- Re: the most obvious failure in To-NoReply, Keith Moore, 12:53
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Tony Hansen, 12:30
- reply problem list, Keith Moore, 12:22
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 12:05
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, D. J. Bernstein, 11:50
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Nathaniel Borenstein, 11:40
- Re: the most obvious failure in To-NoReply, D. J. Bernstein, 11:34
- Re: the most obvious failure in To-NoReply, Keith Moore, 11:27
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 11:18
- Re: the most obvious failure in To-NoReply, D. J. Bernstein, 10:59
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Charles Lindsey, 10:49
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Charles Lindsey, 10:49
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Charles Lindsey, 10:49
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Charles Lindsey, 10:49
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Charles Lindsey, 10:49
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Charles Lindsey, 10:49
- Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, Bruce Lilly, 07:55
- Re: the most obvious failure in To-NoReply, Simon Josefsson, 07:28
- Re: the most obvious failure in To-NoReply, Keith Moore, 06:15
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Nick Ing-Simmons, 03:20
- Re: the most obvious failure in To-NoReply, Simon Josefsson, 02:52
August 29, 2004
- Re: the most obvious failure in To-NoReply, D. J. Bernstein, 23:07
- Re: the most obvious failure in To-NoReply, Keith Moore, 19:03
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, D. J. Bernstein, 19:01
- Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, Laird Breyer, 17:28
- Re: internationalization of mail, Eric Fischer, 16:49
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 16:49
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 16:47
- Re: internationalization of mail, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 15:47
- Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, Bruce Lilly, 14:25
- Re: the most obvious failure in To-NoReply, Bruce Lilly, 14:15
- Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, D. J. Bernstein, 14:03
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Tony Hansen, 14:03
- the most obvious failure in To-NoReply, D. J. Bernstein, 13:51
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, D. J. Bernstein, 13:38
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Tony Hansen, 13:33
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Russ Allbery, 13:26
- Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, Keith Moore, 11:44
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 10:15
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Nathaniel Borenstein, 08:22
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Nathaniel Borenstein, 08:22
August 27, 2004
- Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, Tony Hansen, 19:53
- Re: internationalization of mail, Laird Breyer, 17:03
- Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, ned+ietf-822, 14:15
- Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, Steve Dorner, 14:04
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Russ Allbery, 13:55
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 11:47
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf-822, 11:39
- Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, Keith Moore, 11:01
- Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, ned+ietf-822, 10:31
- Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, Steve Dorner, 10:12
- Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, Keith Moore, 08:57
- Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, Bruce Lilly, 08:40
- Re: internationalization of mail, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 07:21
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 06:05
- Re: internationalization of mail, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 05:24
- Re: internationalization of mail, Laird Breyer, 04:47
- Re: internationalization of mail, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 03:57
- Re: internationalization of mail, Laird Breyer, 03:21
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Simon Josefsson, 02:53
- Re: internationalization of mail, Katsuhiko Momoi, 02:46
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Bill McQuillan, 01:54
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Arnt Gulbrandsen, 01:53
- Re: internationalization of mail, Tex Texin, 01:51
- Re: internationalization of mail, Nick Ing-Simmons, 01:26
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Philip Hazel, 01:13
August 26, 2004
- Re: internationalization of mail, Tex Texin, 23:23
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 20:20
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Charles Lindsey, 19:50
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Charles Lindsey, 19:50
- Re: internationalization of mail, Katsuhiko Momoi, 19:34
- Re: internationalization of mail, Tex Texin, 19:01
- Re: internationalization of mail, Katsuhiko Momoi, 18:47
- internationalization of mail, Tex Texin, 18:20
- Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, Keith Moore, 17:22
- Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, Keith Moore, 17:20
- Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, John C Klensin, 17:03
- Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, Steve Dorner, 16:55
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 16:32
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Simon Josefsson, 16:08
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 15:44
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Simon Josefsson, 15:24
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Simon Josefsson, 15:16
- Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, Keith Moore, 13:45
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 13:43
- Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, Simon Josefsson, 13:20
- draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, John C Klensin, 12:55
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Simon Josefsson, 01:47
August 24, 2004
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Laird Breyer, 20:10
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf-822, 18:09
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf-822, 17:59
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf-822, 17:55
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf-822, 17:52
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 12:06
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Bruce Lilly, 11:34
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 09:50
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Charles Lindsey, 09:12
August 21, 2004
- Re: Diabling Replies, Dave Crocker, 16:18
- Re: The job of an MSA, Bruce Lilly, 14:38
- [Fwd: MSAs (RFC 2476), RFC 2822, and the Date field], Bruce Lilly, 11:56
- Re: The job of an MSA, ned+ietf-822, 07:52
August 18, 2004
- Re: The Bcc Issue, ned+ietf-822, 23:03
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 12:36
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Jacob Palme, 12:16
- Re: The Bcc Issue, ned+ietf-822, 09:27
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Tony Hansen, 09:02
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Bill McQuillan, 08:50
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Nick Ing-Simmons, 08:32
- Re: The Bcc Issue, ned+ietf-822, 08:18
- how to handle microsoft OLE messages?, Venkat Ramisetty, 07:24
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Philip Hazel, 06:40
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Bruce Lilly, 06:39
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Bruce Lilly, 06:34
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Jacob Palme, 06:01
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Philip Hazel, 03:36
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Philip Hazel, 02:11
August 17, 2004
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 21:20
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 21:13
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Kai Henningsen, 21:11
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Kai Henningsen, 21:11
- Re: Diabling Replies, Kai Henningsen, 21:11
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 19:58
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 17:39
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Eric A. Hall, 13:54
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 13:06
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Eric A. Hall, 12:10
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 11:09
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Valdis . Kletnieks, 10:05
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Claus Färber, 02:58
August 16, 2004
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Tony Hansen, 19:47
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Laird Breyer, 18:01
- Re: The job of an MSA, Keith Moore, 15:57
- Re: Disabling Replies, Dave Crocker, 14:50
- Disabling Replies, Bruce Lilly, 14:41
- Re: The job of an MSA, Bruce Lilly, 14:33
- Re: Diabling Replies, Tony Hansen, 14:30
- Re: Diabling Replies, Dave Crocker, 14:25
- Re: Diabling Replies, Dave Crocker, 14:25
- Re: The job of an MSA, Tony Hansen, 14:05
- Re: The job of an MSA, Bruce Lilly, 13:57
- Re: The job of an MSA, Dave Crocker, 13:55
- Re: Diabling Replies, Tony Hansen, 13:54
- Re: The job of an MSA, Tony Hansen, 13:47
- Re: Message-ID and Bcc Was: The Bcc Issue, Bruce Lilly, 13:15
- Re: The job of an MSA, Bruce Lilly, 12:04
- Diabling Replies, Dave Crocker, 11:40
- The job of an MSA, Dave Crocker, 11:35
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Jacob Palme, 10:09
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Bruce Lilly, 09:55
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 08:42
- Re: The Bcc Issue, ned+ietf-822, 08:38
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Nathaniel Borenstein, 08:30
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Tony Hansen, 07:15
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Keith Moore, 06:31
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Nathaniel Borenstein, 06:29
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Keith Moore, 05:04
- To and CC without reply (was: the Bcc issue), Keith Moore, 05:01
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Keith Moore, 04:55
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Charles Lindsey, 04:13
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Charles Lindsey, 04:13
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Charles Lindsey, 04:13
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Charles Lindsey, 04:12
- Message-ID and Bcc Was: The Bcc Issue, Jacob Palme, 00:57
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Jacob Palme, 00:57
August 15, 2004
- Re: The Bcc Issue, ned+ietf-822, 20:09
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Laird Breyer, 19:44
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Keith Moore, 19:27
- Re: The Bcc Issue, ned+ietf-822, 17:04
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Tony Hansen, 16:23
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Nathaniel Borenstein, 08:45
August 13, 2004
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 20:03
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Tony Hansen, 19:03
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Keith Moore, 18:04
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Valdis . Kletnieks, 17:40
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Nathaniel Borenstein, 16:45
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Bruce Lilly, 16:15
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Nathaniel Borenstein, 15:28
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Dave Crocker, 14:52
- Re: The Bcc Issue, ned+ietf-822, 14:52
- Re: The Bcc Issue, ned+ietf-822, 14:52
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Tony Hansen, 12:18
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf-822, 10:29
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf-822, 10:26
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 09:47
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Keith Moore, 08:52
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 08:47
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Nathaniel Borenstein, 08:45
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Nathaniel Borenstein, 08:45
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Eric A. Hall, 08:34
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Keith Moore, 08:21
- Re: The Bcc Issue, Keith Moore, 08:19
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 08:04
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Charles Lindsey, 04:12
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Charles Lindsey, 04:12
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Charles Lindsey, 04:12
- The Bcc Issue, Philip Hazel, 03:24
August 12, 2004
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Bruce Lilly, 17:10
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Eric A. Hall, 15:32
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Tony Hansen, 14:18
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Kai Henningsen, 13:59
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly, 13:45
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Keith Moore, 11:30
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly, 11:05
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Keith Moore, 05:49
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 05:45
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Keith Moore, 05:40
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Charles Lindsey, 04:12
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Charles Lindsey, 04:12
August 11, 2004
- Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Bruce Lilly, 17:06
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly, 16:42
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Keith Moore, 05:33
August 10, 2004
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly, 16:29
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly, 16:24
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Keith Moore, 13:57
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Charles Lindsey, 13:13
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Charles Lindsey, 13:12
August 06, 2004
- Re: RFC validation samples?, Laird Breyer, 18:14
- Re: RFC validation samples?, Laird Breyer, 17:44
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly, 15:36
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Charles Lindsey, 15:23
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Charles Lindsey, 15:23
- Re: RFC validation samples?, Bruce Lilly, 12:52
- Re: RFC validation samples?, Keith Moore, 07:17
August 05, 2004
- Re: RFC validation samples?, Laird Breyer, 21:05
- Re: RFC validation samples?, Laird Breyer, 20:54
- Re: RFC validation samples?, Bruce Lilly, 20:05
- Re: RFC validation samples?, Bruce Lilly, 19:37
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly, 19:06
- Re: RFC validation samples?, Laird Breyer, 19:04
- Re: RFC validation samples?, Laird Breyer, 18:41
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly, 18:39
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly, 18:36
- Re: RFC validation samples?, Keith Moore, 18:26
- Re: RFC validation samples?, Bruce Lilly, 17:56
- Re: RFC validation samples?, Bruce Lilly, 17:37
- Re: RFC validation samples?, Bruce Lilly, 17:27
- Re: RFC validation samples?, Bruce Lilly, 17:09
- Re: RFC validation samples?, Keith Moore, 09:38
- Re: RFC validation samples?, Nick Ing-Simmons, 09:15
- Re: RFC validation samples?, Keith Moore, 07:52
August 02, 2004
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Keith Moore, 21:12
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Charles Lindsey, 15:59
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Charles Lindsey, 15:59