Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks

> In <053A4319-EC5E-11D8-B09E-000393DB5366(_at_)cs(_dot_)utk(_dot_)edu> Keith 
> Moore <moore(_at_)cs(_dot_)utk(_dot_)edu> writes:
>
> > > Both these practices are already widespread, and they are not going to 
> > > stop just because we say so.
> > that's not a good reason for standardizing them.  and they don't meet 
> > the criteria in 2026.
> But I don't want to standardize them. All I want to say is that "if" you
> want to use a bogus address "for whatever reason", then please at least do
> it in such and such a way.
>
> You can still say that, even if you deprecate the use of bogus addresses
> at the same time. Because users are going to do it whether you deprecate
> it or not (there is no way to stop them). King Canute has already been
> mentioned in this thread.
sometimes I think we need a separate label for documents -
"least harmful current practice".  but we don't have one yet.