Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks

Charles Lindsey wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 21:39:21 -0400, Bruce Lilly <blilly(_at_)erols(_dot_)com> 
>  wrote:
>
> > More than two weeks have passed with no substantive objection that I  can
> > see to the principle of making the From field optional in the 
> > successor to
> > RFC 2822.  If there are any such objections, please speak up soon.
> Well I have provided strong and substantive objections for a start.
Exactly what objection to making From optional do you think you have
provided?