Charles Lindsey wrote:
In <41140803(_dot_)5000809(_at_)erols(_dot_)com> Bruce Lilly
<blilly(_at_)erols(_dot_)com> writes:
Charles Lindsey wrote:
Well I have provided strong and substantive objections for a start.
Exactly what objection to making From optional do you think you have
provided?
If you cannot be bothered to read the discussion to find the objections
made to your proposal, then I have not the time to do your reading for
you.
Charles, I have read your remarks; there is a great deal of blathering
about ".invalid", which is not the proposal at hand. I have seen
no substantive objections to relaxing the requirement for a From
header field. If you cannot provide a succinct summary of any such
objections when politely requested to do so, it can only be assumed
that you have none.