Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks
2004-08-11 16:42:25
Keith Moore wrote:
From: <""@[]>
is syntactically valid, though.
yeech.
Agreed.
my gut sense is that omitting From: will cause fewer problems than
either From: <> or From: <""@[]>
Yes, that's why the first is the proposal on the table.
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, (continued)
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Charles Lindsey
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Charles Lindsey
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Charles Lindsey
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Charles Lindsey
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Keith Moore
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Keith Moore
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks,
Bruce Lilly <=
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Keith Moore
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Keith Moore
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Charles Lindsey
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Keith Moore
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Charles Lindsey
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Keith Moore
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Keith Moore
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Keith Moore |
Next by Date: |
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Bruce Lilly |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Keith Moore |
Next by Thread: |
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Keith Moore |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|