Hmm, now I'm really confused. If you're about to transmit a set of
messages, and what you have is an mbox file whose format you think you
understand, why don't you package it up as a proper MIME multipart
before transmitting??? -- Nathaniel
On Aug 30, 2004, at 7:40 AM, Charles Lindsey wrote:
In <3A2B8E94-F90A-11D8-8B53-000A9571873E(_at_)guppylake(_dot_)com> Nathaniel
Borenstein <nsb(_at_)guppylake(_dot_)com> writes:
On Aug 24, 2004, at 9:14 AM, Charles Lindsey wrote:
We are talking about a new application type, which we presume some
people
will write new software to generate/accept (otherwise there is little
point in having the application type).
Do we really want people to write new software to *generate* mbox
format data? I was thinking of this as primarily a tool for allowing
software to label and read data that is only available in mbox format.
Is there any circumstance in which we would actually encourage its
generation?
I don't think we need new software to generante mboxen, but what I was
referring to was software/scripts to generate messages with
application/mbox for transporting mboxen already generated by whatever
means. Such software/script would naturally incorporate whatever
parameters has been defined for that application type.
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own
thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web:
http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8
3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14
A4 AB A5