[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Understanding response protocols

2004-11-08 05:12:39

In <20041105104547(_dot_)GG636(_at_)trokan(_dot_)micronas(_dot_)com> Martin 
Trautmann <traut(_at_)gmx(_dot_)de> writes:

On 2004-11-01 17:48, Charles Lindsey wrote:
I much prefer those lists which set Reply-To (I have been on lists where
the members have voted to have it set so), even though I have to remember
which list is which in order to press the right Reply button.

What happens on these lists when the sender defined a Reply-To of his own?
I guess it's just replaced?

The opinion expressed several times in these recent threads is that a
Reply-To field already set by the sender ought to be left alone by a
mailing list expander. Likewise an MFT header if/when we have one.

Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133   Web:
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, 
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>