At 2:48 PM -0500 3/9/03, Alan DeKok wrote:
There is *no* way that any legitimate
business would be sending that much mail to addresses which don't
exist, and *never* clean out bounces.
That much, no. But certainly some don't bother cleaning things out.
Here are a sampling of the addresses that were still sending to a
former dotcom two years after the domain had been turned off.
Return-Path:
<unh(_dot_)connection-owner(_at_)rccweb(_dot_)sr(_dot_)unh(_dot_)edu>
From: Schwab Alerts <SchwabAlerts(_dot_)MyPortfolio(_at_)Schwab(_dot_)com>
Return-Path:
<afterthebell-html-return-423-emallen=netcentric(_dot_)com(_at_)marketwatchmail(_dot_)com>
Return-Path: <TechTarget-23EC2830965A818B(_at_)lists(_dot_)techtarget(_dot_)com>
Return-Path: <nlsystem(_at_)maillist(_dot_)newsfactor(_dot_)com>
Return-Path: <offers(_at_)rate(_dot_)quicken(_dot_)com>
From: Adobe Systems Incorporated
<Adobe-112161-5806(_at_)adobe(_dot_)mx0(_dot_)net>
--
Kee Hinckley
http://www.puremessaging.com/ Junk-Free Email Filtering
http://commons.somewhere.com/buzz/ Writings on Technology and Society
I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept
responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate
everyone else's.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg