In message
<5(_dot_)1(_dot_)0(_dot_)14(_dot_)0(_dot_)20030317231031(_dot_)00b396d0(_at_)mail(_dot_)SoftHome(_dot_)net>,
meor(_at_)mail(_dot_)SoftHome(_dot_)net wrote:
... after which the mose astute portion of the spammer community figures
out that they will increase their odds of delivery dramatically, simply
by sending out their spams with the forged envelope sender address of
<news(_at_)cnn(_dot_)com>.
No, you are wrong. Digital signatures are used to assert
identity. Digital signatures are verifiable and unforgable.
Hint: CNN does not use digital signatures to identify any of its
outgoing mail at the present time.
Unless you have a plan to change that, your scheme isn't worth the
electrons it is written on.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg