Re: [Asrg] 5b. Opt-Out, 2nd version
2003-03-27 08:51:00
On Thursday, March 27, 2003, at 03:04 AM, Markus Stumpf wrote:
I have yet to see a reason why spammers should honor an opt-out list
at all.
With snail mail it a massive cost factor, so "robinson lists" save a
lot
of money for the sender.
It's yet another example of lumping the e-marketers in with the
fraudulent spammers, and assuming they're one in the same in search of
"a solution". The e-marketing segment is a different beast (and a much
tinier problem) to the problem of all that forged garbage. The folks
who are already hiding themselves won't deal with opt-out lists, other
than to grab them to spam to them, also. Opt-out lists would be great
with the e-marketing segment, but 100% compliance in that segment
woldn't even be noticed if we don't fix the bigger problem.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Asrg] 5b. Opt-Out, 2nd version, (continued)
- RE: [Asrg] 5b. Opt-Out, 2nd version, Kee Hinckley
- RE: [Asrg] 5b. Opt-Out, 2nd version, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Asrg] 5b. Opt-Out, 2nd version, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [Asrg] 5b. Opt-Out, 2nd version, Brad Templeton
- Re: [Asrg] 5b. Opt-Out, 2nd version, Markus Stumpf
- Re: [Asrg] 5b. Opt-Out, 2nd version,
Chuq Von Rospach <=
- Re: [Asrg] 5b. Opt-Out, 2nd version, Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] 5b. Opt-Out, 2nd version, Markus Stumpf
RE: [Asrg] 5b. Opt-Out, 2nd version, william
Re: [Asrg] 5b. Opt-Out, 2nd version, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Asrg] 5b. Opt-Out, 2nd version, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
|
|
|