Re: [Asrg] define spam


On Sunday, March 30, 2003, at 09:31  AM, Vernon Schryver wrote:

(perhaps I'm wrong;


Nah. not possible.

But I've had my say, I won't rehash it again. but when people startposturing by doign things like saying "Mr. Von Rospach", it's clear thediscussion is actually over, anyway.





_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: [Asrg] define spam, (continued) RE: [Asrg] define spam, asrg Re: [Asrg] define spam, wayne Re: [Asrg] define spam, Dave Crocker Re: [Asrg] define spam, Brad Templeton Re: [Asrg] define spam, Alan DeKok Re: [Asrg] define spam, william Re: [Asrg] define spam, Chuq Von Rospach Re: [Asrg] define spam, Vernon Schryver Re: [Asrg] define spam, Chuq Von Rospach Re: [Asrg] define spam, Vernon Schryver Re: [Asrg] define spam, Chuq Von Rospach <= Re: [Asrg] define spam, Vernon Schryver Re: [Asrg] define spam, J C Lawrence Re: [Asrg] define spam, Vernon Schryver Re: [Asrg] define spam, J C Lawrence Re: [Asrg] define spam, Vernon Schryver [Asrg] Collecting normative definitions, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine Re: [Asrg] define spam, J C Lawrence Re: [Asrg] define spam, william Re: [Asrg] define spam, J C Lawrence Re: [Asrg] define spam, Brad Templeton

Previous by Date:	Re: [Asrg] Consent, Brad Templeton
Next by Date:	Re: [Asrg] define spam, Vernon Schryver
Previous by Thread:	Re: [Asrg] define spam, Vernon Schryver
Next by Thread:	Re: [Asrg] define spam, Vernon Schryver
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]