I do so love it when people pull these games in the middle of a private
conversation.
Now I'm convinced this group has shown why groups like this won't solve
the problem. And I think he proves my belief the insult was intentional.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON>
Date: Sun Mar 30, 2003 1:28:08 PM US/Pacific
To: <chuqui(_at_)plaidworks(_dot_)com>
Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details
The original message was received at Sun, 30 Mar 2003 13:27:54 -0800
(PST)
from dsl081-078-186.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.78.186]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<vjs(_at_)calcite(_dot_)rhyolite(_dot_)com>
(reason: 550 5.7.1 REJECT go away: Sent to DCC)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to calcite.rhyolite.com.:
DATA
<<< 550 5.7.1 REJECT go away: Sent to DCC
554 5.0.0 Service unavailable
Reporting-MTA: dns; plaidworks.com
Arrival-Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 13:27:54 -0800 (PST)
Final-Recipient: RFC822; vjs(_at_)calcite(_dot_)rhyolite(_dot_)com
Action: failed
Status: 5.7.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; calcite.rhyolite.com
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 5.7.1 REJECT go away: Sent to DCC
Last-Attempt-Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 13:28:08 -0800 (PST)
From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui(_at_)plaidworks(_dot_)com>
Date: Sun Mar 30, 2003 1:27:53 PM US/Pacific
To: Vernon Schryver <vjs(_at_)calcite(_dot_)rhyolite(_dot_)com>
Subject: Re: [Asrg] define spam
On Sunday, March 30, 2003, at 12:32 PM, Vernon Schryver wrote:
A minor point of order or style: I get formal when I'm trying to
avoid unintended insults.
that's okay, I felt it was intentional all along. I'm still of that
mind.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg