On July 7, 2003 at 19:23 elric(_at_)novitraq(_dot_)com (Elric Pedder) wrote:
"Any measure for stopping spam must ensure that all messages
either reach the intended recipient, or are returned to the
sender, or the sender notified."
Yeah, I'm sure Ralsky et al will thank everyone for the help.
This really only makes sense when we again think of spam like an
individual sending a msg which one may or may not want.
Howsabout when it's 200+ hijacked servers banging at you full-speed
with the same spam? That's the reality.
Is the proposal to send the hundreds of msgs per minute each a proper
handwritten no thank you note?
It's amazing to me how many different people (specifically the EFF in
this case) will step up to the plate with a shallow, harebrained,
mental model of the spam problem and begin offering authoritative
advice.
--
-Barry Shein
Software Tool & Die | bzs(_at_)TheWorld(_dot_)com |
http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 617-739-0202 | Login: 617-739-WRLD
The World | Public Access Internet | Since 1989 *oo*
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg