At 08:09 PM 7/7/2003 -0400, you wrote:
On July 7, 2003 at 19:23 elric(_at_)novitraq(_dot_)com (Elric Pedder) wrote:
> "Any measure for stopping spam must ensure that all messages
> either reach the intended recipient, or are returned to the
> sender, or the sender notified."
Yeah, I'm sure Ralsky et al will thank everyone for the help.
This really only makes sense when we again think of spam like an
individual sending a msg which one may or may not want.
Howsabout when it's 200+ hijacked servers banging at you full-speed
with the same spam? That's the reality.
Is the proposal to send the hundreds of msgs per minute each a proper
handwritten no thank you note?
....
Therefore just to clarify your statement, are you suggesting these spam
emails should not be rejected but rather thrown away silently? So within
the consent model, if you specified that you do not wish to receive email
from dial-up IP addresses, any email coming from those addresses should be
thrown away and not even reported or tracked somewhere?
Yakov
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg