At 12:59 AM 7/23/2003, Paul Judge wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yakov Shafranovich [mailto:research(_at_)solidmatrix(_dot_)com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 11:47 PM
> To: Paul Judge; 'asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org'
> Subject: Re: [Asrg] 0. ASRG Website updated
>
>
> At 06:39 PM 7/14/2003, Paul Judge wrote:
> >...
> >
> >1. The updated Work Items/Research Agenda that was
> distributed on the
> >mailing list last week. I have not received any feedback on the
> >research agenda. Do we feel that it is complete? Also, a number of
> >items on the list need volunteers. .....
>
> In particular 8. Evaluation, do we need to specify that every
> individual
> proposal needs to address every item listed in the
> requirements document?
> This has been the approach used by the IMPP WG.
>
This would be ideal. First, we have to get a more mature draft of the
requirements document done.(Speaking of which, if any group member would
like to join Eric and Russell in maturing the requirements doc, please email
me.) Also, proposals should include an analysis based on an agreed upon
evaluation framework. The start of such an evaluation framework has been put
together in Crocker's draft. The next step here is to define metrics for
each of the characeristics.
Should we start a point-by-point discussion of the requirements perhaps?
And do we need additional documents for the evaluation framework besides
Crocker's draft?
Yakov
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg