It is so very kind of Habeas to identify so precisely the mail that I
don't wish to see. The information that they put in their headers almost
guarantee that as a busy person, I can safely (and automatically) ignore
their authenticated messages.
I am speaking as an individual here - in other words as the person who
has the final say in what shows up in front of my eyes, I can (and do)
now identify whole classes of mail that previously I could not.
Thank you Habeas
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: asrg-admin(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org [mailto:asrg-admin(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org]
On
Behalf Of david nicol
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 5:17 AM
To: Matt Sergeant
Cc: asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [Asrg] 7. Best Practices - DNSBLs - Article
No, I am not. But perhaps some large organization might. If
the legal defenses on copyright infringement _work_ then the
game turns into finding your customer noncompliant so you can
sue them and fund your continuing activity. Not a pretty
vision, but self-funding.
On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 04:56, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On Tuesday, Aug 12, 2003, at 09:20 Europe/London, david nicol wrote:
I hereby license the above haiku for use as a service mark of the
ASRG committee for purposes of marking a blacklisting service as
compliant with a to-be-produced blacklist standards document
Are you willing to invest in defending that copyright though? That's
the point of Habeas.
Matt.
--
David Nicol / If at first you don't succeed, use a bigger hammer.
http://gallaghersmash.com
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg