At 3:03 PM -0400 2003/08/29, Yakov Shafranovich wrote:
So what should we suggest as part of the BCPs?
I believe that we should document the kinds of things that could
be done, discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each method, and
then make some recommendations towards the end.
However, I believe that any set of recommendations would have to
include the strongly encouraged use of a multivariate scoring system,
such as currently used today in tools like SpamAssasin, plus
recommendations for relative values for each of the criteria to be
judged.
But that's just my personal view. I am a strong proponent of
basing things like this on consensus, and we would have to see what
the other members of the BCP subgroup have to say.
--
Brad Knowles, <brad(_dot_)knowles(_at_)skynet(_dot_)be>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+
!w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg