----- Original Message -----
From: "Markus Stumpf" <maex-lists-spam-ietf-asrg(_at_)Space(_dot_)Net>
To: "Hector Santos" <winserver(_dot_)support(_at_)winserver(_dot_)com>
Cc: "Philip Miller" <millenix(_at_)zemos(_dot_)net>; <asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 7:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Re: 6. Proposals: MTA MARK
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 06:55:57PM -0500, Hector Santos wrote:
Remember, CAN-SPAM is a double edge, it places controls and restrictions
but
it also gives spammers the legal authority to send spam and if a mail
system
is rejecting/filtering mail using non-CAN-SPAM methodologies, it can
potentially opens Pandora's box.
Please remember that CAN-SPAM (as a law) is totally irrelevant to most of
the world.
That goes without saying.
But that does not mean foreign mail coming into the US can not be subject to
legal restrictive access. It just means a foreign non-compliant sytem
would not (or more difficult) to be subject to penalties or charged with a
crime. By the same token, it may be that a foreign compliant system have
less or no rights to sue anyone in the states for blocking mail using
non-compliant methods. :-)
-- Hector
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg