ietf-asrg
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?

2003-12-16 11:45:36
"Hector Santos" <winserver(_dot_)support(_at_)winserver(_dot_)com> wrote:
Does LMAP address IP ranges?

  Yes.  See the various drafts for different syntactic ways of
implementing this.

Are we ready to say that dynamic IP senders are no longer allowed?

  That's up to the domain they claim to be associated with.  The
recipient MTA doesn't know, or care, that the user has a dynamic IP.

The way I see it from an implementation standpoint, LMAP can only be used
for a "accept" logic.  It can't be used to reject for lack of a LMAP based
information.

  That's pretty much what the document says.

        LMAP  AUTH
         0               0         Low trust
         1               0         X trust
          0              1         Y trust
          1               1        Z trust

Z is great,  Y is still better than X.   With just X,  we are still
scratching our heads which is the point you are making I believe.   What I
am saying, you don't need X if you have Y 

  I don't see why.

  SMTP AUTH is a user to sending MTA authentication protocol.  LMAP is
an domain to MTA authorization protocol.  I don't see why using one
would negate the need for the other.

  Alan DeKok.

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>