"Hector Santos" <winserver(_dot_)support(_at_)winserver(_dot_)com> wrote:
Who has LMAP deployed currently to evaluate its effectiveness?
Read the related drafts. Many have been implemented.
What is the recommended refusal methods for a LMAP rejection?
I'm not sure what you mean by that.
Does LMAP offer a fallback?
To what? Read the discussion paper, and the various protocol
drafts, they discuss this topic.
Does LMAP rejection pre-empt an ESMTP AUTH?
Does LMAP even allow for ESMTP AUTH to be reached?
Read the discussion paper and the drafts. They make it clear that
those questions are orthogonal to LMAP, and are thus local site
configuration issues. i.e. They're irrelevant to LMAP.
You have to just put yourself in the position of the engineer that will be
programming this and passing it on to customers. Right now ESMTP AUTH
trumps all restrictions or issues that deal with SPAM or dynamic IP or
whatever. Where and how LMAP would fit in with everything else is what I
am trying to see.
Read the documents.
Alan DeKok.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg