Alan DeKok wrote:
John Levine <asrg(_at_)johnlevine(_dot_)com> wrote:
I don't know of anyone who has much interest in getting SMTP
connections from random PPP and DHCP users. I know that to a very
close approximation, that mail is 100% spam and viruses.
Few people disagree with you there.
See the list archives for flame wars involving people who want to
*send* messages from random PPP accounts, and random addresses via
DHCP. Also note that there are zero responses[1] to requests asking
"what's wrong with SUBMIT, or umpteen other submission methods".
>
Alan DeKok.
[1] I don't count responses which amount to "I don't want to change my
behavior", or "SMTP on port 25 is the One True Way to deliver mail,
everything else is evil."
Currently, I deliver mail from a cable-modem hosted MTA that also hosts the
backup MX for a domain I share with some friends. I relay through
smtp.comcast.net, so I'm not sure if you really count that. However, I have
encountered systems that check each machine in the Received: headers against
dialup/DHCP lists. Hell, on one occasion, smtp.comcast.net has been
blacklisted, when if I could do direct delivery, my mail would have gotten
through.
LMAP as an addition to the status quo would hurt me even more, because
there's no possible way I could create acceptable LMAP entries for my domain
unless recipients start accepting mail from dynamic addresses. SUBMIT is
irrelevant here, because my server *is* the "real" one, the one that
authenticates mail from my domain. So filtering mail from non-leased
addresses is not just a matter of mail submission.
I'm quite willing to change my behaviour, if you can tell me how. I would be
delighted to declare accountability for messages from my own server, if only
to remove the need for my ISP's relay.
Philip Miller
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg