ietf-asrg
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Asrg] Usefulness of wholesale blocking of attachments for SMTP?

2004-04-17 20:10:27
Lane Sharman wrote:
What interests me is point of origin detection, identification and blocking. In other words, what addition to the SMTP protocol would make it possible to identify, for example, "unstamped email being sent out in bulk mode". Statistically, isn't it possible to identify an instance of a bulk email event on the net?

DCC (http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/dcc/) tries to detect bulk emails as do some other projects. This is not something that requires addition to SMTP and is an separate protocol.

Of course we must remember that bulk email is not necessarily bad. There are many instances of legit bulk email (e.g. acceptance letters from a college, bank statement notifications, etc.). So knowing that a specific email is bulk is only half the problem, once you know it is bulk there needs to be a determination as to whether it is legit or not.

This is what Project Lumus, TEOS and some other mechanisms try to do - whitelist or accredit legit bulk emailers. Of course, a single unified framework of standard for the entire Internet on exchanging accreditation and reputation data is something that might solve this as well, so far there hasn't been sufficient interest in that area (the SMTP-VERIFY subgroup was looking into it as some point).

Yakov

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>