At any rate, no system I can think of outside of e-mail is purely
geared towards resolving some sort of receiver pays other than some
much-maligned, relatively recent cell-phone systems and even on those
there's much activity to either block or change the charging for
marketing calls.
I don't think anyone's suggesting the recipient should pay for e-mail.
What we do want is for the sender to pay the recipient's costs, because
the recipient's costs are much greater than those due to mere
transport.
--------------------------------------------------------------
from: Jonathan "Chromatix" Morton
mail: chromi(_at_)chromatix(_dot_)demon(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk
website: http://www.chromatix.uklinux.net/
tagline: The key to knowledge is not to rely on people to teach you it.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg