ietf-asrg
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Asrg] Comments on draft-church-dnsbl-harmful-01.txt

2006-03-30 11:21:54
Daniel Feenberg wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2006, Nick Nicholas wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, March 30, 2006 at 8:49 AM Tony Finch wrote:
>>
>>> DNSBLs are not only useful, they are crucial.
>>
>>
>> I'm not disagreeing with you, in fact I agree wholeheartedly.  However,
>> does any empirical data exist to support this assertion?  I think we
>
>
> What sort of data did you want to see? Something about the average
> success rates and false positive rates over all DNSBLs? Or an analysis
> of one or a couple? When I looked, I found that most DNSBLs blocked
> little spam, but that the best were quite effective. Is it sufficient to
> show that the best are well run, or do we have to show that all are?

Does there not exist something like, oh say, BLreports that
judges you on false positive/false negative, coverage, timeliness,
etc?

                Mike

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>