Daniel Feenberg <feenberg(_at_)nber(_dot_)org> wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2006, John Levine wrote:
Point by point suggestions for improvement, e.g., section 42.1 argues
foo, whereas the author seems unfamiliar with bar which contradicts
his points. Basically enough to hand back to the author to say "fix
all this and we'll look at it again."
Surely that form of response conceeds the correctness of the sentiment
expressed in the draft title.
Point 0: The title should be corrected to "DNSBLs are harmful to
spammers" or "DNSBLs are helpful to mailbox owners".
Seth
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg