Re: [Asrg] Comments on draft-church-dnsbl-harmful-01.txt

On 2006-03-31 11:30:57 -0800, Douglas Otis wrote:
> On Mar 31, 2006, at 11:18 AM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> > On 2006-03-30 19:31:44 +0100, Tony Finch wrote:
> > > On my servers, DNSBLs deal with about 80% of ALL email (including  
> > > internal email - our mail hub handles everything).
> > That's impressive. For our servers it was little more than 5% in  
> > the second half of 2005.
> 5% is about the right figure for the traditional RBL.  There are  
> other lists that prove far more effective.  As an RBL list is  
> effective at prohibiting a source, other sources are then uncovered.   
> A greater percentage will be found using the newer types of lists.   
> These newer lists look beyond just the RBL and approach the 80%  
> figure that Nick indicates.  : )
Any hints on which lists these are? ;-)

        hp

-- 
   _  | Peter J. Holzer    | Ich sehe nun ein, dass Computer wenig
|_|_) | Sysadmin WSR       | geeignet sind, um sich was zu merken.
| |   | hjp(_at_)hjp(_dot_)at         |
__/   | http://www.hjp.at/ |    -- Holger Lembke in dan-am

pgpqiIhWkGy4c.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg