ietf-asrg
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Asrg] Comments on draft-church-dnsbl-harmful-01.txt

2006-03-31 14:39:08
On 3/31/06, Douglas Otis <dotis(_at_)mail-abuse(_dot_)org> wrote:


5% is about the right figure for the traditional RBL.  There are
other lists that prove far more effective.  As an RBL list is
effective at prohibiting a source, other sources are then uncovered.
A greater percentage will be found using the newer types of lists.
These newer lists look beyond just the RBL and approach the 80%
figure that Nick indicates.  : )

-Doug


What techniques are these "newer" lists using that increases their
effectiveness so much?

-Jim
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg