Seth Breidbart wrote:
Matt Sergeant <msergeant(_at_)messagelabs(_dot_)com> wrote:
On 14-Feb-07, at 6:46 PM, Seth Breidbart wrote:
Consider dsnbl.noprimes.org.
How often do you think it's reasonable to require me to check whether
a given number has turned composite while I wasn't looking?
Quoting the BCP:
With the exception of DNSBLs that that are based on data that does
not change...
On the other hand, "I have received spam from <ip>" is data that does
not change (once true).
Then a 6 month timeout wouldn't apply, would it?
Entirely aside from the fact that a DNSBL listing on that basis would,
in the fullness of time, list just about every IP in existance.
Everybody leaks.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg