On 7/31/07, Barry Shein <bzs(_at_)world(_dot_)std(_dot_)com> wrote:
That said, I don't think one generally needs to repeat something like
that in a context like this; it should be tacit.
If everything that should be tacit was left out, there wouldn't be much left
AFAICT. In general. Redundancy is good, especially in introductory
material. Same message in different forms. Few people have well
organized schema that integrate new data on the first pass.
Complaints off-list please.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg