ietf-asrg
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Asrg] moving the two DNSBL drafts forward

2008-11-24 23:39:50
Rich Kulawiec wrote:
One questions on irtf-asrg-dnsbl:

Is it worth discussing usage of other means to propagate DNSxLs,
e.g., rsync?

Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be enough commonality to suggest
one way or another as being reasonably standard.

Regardless of the answer, I think this one is fine.


On irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists, near the end of section 1.2, text reads:

      DNSBLs can, and have, ceased operation without notice.  DNSBL users
      SHOULD periodically check the correct operation of the DNSBL, and
      cease using DNSBLs that are working incorrectly

I suggest considering:

      DNSBLs can, and have, ceased operation without notice.  DNSBL users
      SHOULD periodically check the correct operation of the DNSBL, and
      SHOULD cease using DNSBLs that are working incorrectly

which adds a second "SHOULD" for clarity.  But I freely admit that this
may be a nit and not worth the bother.  So again, regardless of the
answer, I think this one is fine.

I can put that in the nit list, no biggie.

Thank you to the authors for their diligence and hard work.

Thanks for helping!
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg