ietf-asrg
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Asrg] is SMTP still really store-and-forward ?

2008-11-28 16:03:16
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Chris Lewis <clewis(_at_)nortel(_dot_)com> 
wrote:
Your list article traversed _four_ store-and-forward hops after leaving
the IETF mail server before getting to me - and those are just our
internal MTAs.  And it looks like it went thru several store-and-forward
hops getting from your account on gmail to the IETF, and a couple inside
the IETF.

I said "realm" not "host." From the list to all of our in-boxes, the
envelope return address was politely changed to
"asrg-bounces(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org" by Mailman version 2.1.9.

Figure 1 in rfc821 is the SMTP model, and it does not involve
intermediate hops.  Complex multi-host systems one one side or the
other collapse into "Sender SMTP" and "Receiver SMTP" in that diagram.

gmail realm <-> irtf realm <-> nortel realm

Two transmissions between realms.

I meant "realm" not "host" which is what I said.  If there's a better
term for what I mean by "realm" I am open to changing my terminology.

In arguing to drop store-and-forward as a requirement, the internal of
operations of a realm are considered a black box outside the FUSSP's
scope.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg