Douglas Otis wrote:
On 12/15/09 11:46 AM, John Leslie wrote:
I agree a vouching service may cash a fee from the mail domain they
vouch for. This does not imply corruption, though.
There are actual expenses involved in vouching. A fee is needed to
cover these in most cases.
Running just a feedback conduit service, information gained might help
assist other email related services that could offset the related costs.
Consolidating reports also helps defray network expenses, by utilizing
input more than output directions.
This thread has become quite intricate. Many useful ideas, but they
are difficult to sort out because there's little concordance on
foundations... As a sort of kōan, let me ask this deliverability
question:
What are the differences between being vouched for by an MGRS and
relaying through an external smart host?
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg