This describes two different semantics for a DKIM signature. Where does the
current DKIM specification provide for such distinction in the semantics, so
that it can be reliably and accurately interpreted by a verifying agent?
I don't think it does. And I think this is a problem.
As always, I would appreciate a description of the problem that you
believe that needs to be solved. Not "multiple message signatures", a
problem that affects the way that people use their e-mail. After all,
we've already agreed that the amount of list mail with forged
originator addresses is extremely small, so that can't be it.
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org