John Levine wrote:
This describes two different semantics for a DKIM signature. Where does the
current DKIM specification provide for such distinction in the semantics, so
that it can be reliably and accurately interpreted by a verifying agent?
I don't think it does. And I think this is a problem.
As always, I would appreciate a description of the problem that you
believe that needs to be solved.
Yes, and you seem to want it (a) immediately, and (b) in a form that is
so lacking in detail that it is easy to argue against.
Keith
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org