On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Keith Moore wrote:
If you mean that trusting someone else to decide, on behalf of a large and
diverse set of users, what is good for all of those users, is a poorly chosen
policy - then I emphatically agree.
I think that's the only reasonably scalable way to implement spam
filtering. Most users use some kind of webmail system which has that kind
of policy determination built in (though it probably has some per-user
tuning). AFAICT the people who are best at it are the large anti-spam
specialists such as Brightmail, MessageLabs, AOL, because you need plenty
of data to get an accurate idea of who the bad guys are.
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <dot(_at_)dotat(_dot_)at> http://dotat.at/
BISCAY: WEST 5 OR 6 BECOMING VARIABLE 3 OR 4. SHOWERS AT FIRST. MODERATE OR
GOOD.
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org