ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] is this a problem or not?

2005-10-30 08:34:45
1. Alice works for Alice-Corp who publish a policy to the effect
    that they and only they sign all their outbound mail.
2. Alice posts a message to Foo-list which signs the message
    itself and drops Alice's signature.
3. Bob receives the message from the Foo-list, signed by the list.
4. Bob looks up Alice-Corp's ssp assertion and considers the
    message as having a bad signature.
5. In order to allieviate this problem Alice-Corp are forced
    to weaken their policy to allow 3rd party signatures to be
    accepted by Bob.

I don't consider this a problem per se. In this case, Alice-Corp has made a conscious decision to refrain from the maximum possible protection in order to allow Alice access to a mailing list. So a decision was made at Alice-Corp that granting access to the list for Alice is more important than an Exclusive policy. This was their decision to make and DKIM is flexible enough to allow for it.

Other companies may decide that it's unwise to completely relax policy on a domain-wide scale simply to allow mailing list use. For those, putting list participants on a separate sub-domain could solve the problem.

--
Arvel



_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org