And if DKIM isn't an easy replacement for DK, it may never be deployed
widely at all.
gosh, what an interesting point. one might almost think it would be
good to restrict specification changes to those that are essential for
dkim's success.
oops. unreasonable suggestion. all sorts of nasty (albeit ill-defined)
implications.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
+1.408.246.8253
dcrocker a t ...
WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org