On Jan 4, 2006, at 7:47 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
Seriously, there will be a time when the group should be focusing
on the policy stuff, but its just not yet. For now we ought be
focusing on the threats draft.
There are a fair number of claims being made in the threat draft
regarding SSP that are not justified. These issues have been largely
ignored. There have been concerns raised regarding the secondary
effects of the authorization scheme that also have bee largely ignored.
You also ought accept that making the same "not ssp" point in a
million ways doesn't make it a new point.
Much of the threat review is premised upon assumptions of protections
offered by the SSP mechanism. What concern do you have regarding the
unfair treatment and disruptions the SSP mechanism permits. When
someone attempts to discuss the merits of these concerns, why
introduce malarkey about everyone already knowing. What points are
you willing to concede? What points are not correct in your view?
-Doug
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org