ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Attempted summary, SSP again

2006-01-27 08:48:03
Hector Santos wrote:
I would think ProcessB() is more ideal, more efficient and 100% DKIM/SSP
compatible, and more importantly with a rejection result that is mostly
likely to be more correct than ProcessA() acceptance of an OA domain
policy voilation.

This is not an issue of efficiency, it's an issue of getting the
semantics correct. Your interpretation is not correct. And if I
had some caffeine, I could probably construct interesting DOS
attacks against your semantics for the first party.

                Mike
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org