ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Attempted summary, SSP again

2006-01-27 08:57:21

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Thomas" <mike(_at_)mtcc(_dot_)com>

For the EXCLUSIVE policy?  Following SSP, it would be a
REJECT because the policy says no 3PS should exist.

That's not what it says. It says:

      "!  All mail from the entity is signed; Third-Party
          signatures SHOULD NOT be accepted"

In the context, it means that it requires a first party signature.
It should probably be more explicit on this point.

In the context of the Levine's question,

   Levine:
   "if a message has both a signature from the From: domain
    and one from someone else, does that pass?  Why or why not?"

Following your SSP draft description as posted above, this would be an
unaccepted condition.

What is the difference?

--
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com



_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org