On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 11:55:51AM -0700, Michael Thomas allegedly wrote:
Mark Delany wrote:
OLD: TXT records are encoded as described in Section 3.6.1.
So I've circulated the draft DKK to a couple of people to get the
roughest edges off.
One of the big questions asked in that draft relates to the
relationship between TXT and DKK semantics. Which one is authoritative
and which one is a mirror? Or should base be authoritative and both
the TXT and DKK simply be particular representations?
Is there really any reason to force one to be the master of the other?
Simply to avoid duplication of semantics. I was merely asking which
text is the source of truth and where should it reside. Also,
presumably if a DKK springs into existence, the TXT may well be frozen
at some point with new functionality only going into the DKK RR.
Mark.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html