Hector,
Hector Santos wrote:
Jim Fenton wrote:
The question is simply, "should it be possible for an SSP record
published by example.com to also apply to sub.example.com [for any
value of sub]".
Yes, but allowance is made for the sub as well. Isn't the specs
currently written as such?
draft-allman-dkim-ssp does attempt to address subdomains, but there are
problems with its methodology that I presented at the WG meeting. I know
you weren't there, but if you look at the slides at
http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/06nov/slides/dkim-3.pdf, especially
slide 4, it discusses this further.
But this question is about the SSP requirements draft. Currently the
requirements draft is silent on this issue, and not all of the drafts
presented at the WG meeting address propagation of SSP to subdomains,
which is what prompts me to ask the question. Lookup order would then
be a secondary question if we decide that we need to address subdomains.
-Jim
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html