I'm thinking of the following addition to the p= description in 3.6.1:
INFORMATIVE NOTE: A base64string is permitted to include white space
(LWSP) at arbitrary places; however, any CRLFs must be followed by at
least one WSP character. Implementors and administrators are
cautioned to ensure that selector TXT records conform to this
specification.
eric
--On March 8, 2007 1:10:36 AM +0000 Stephen Farrell
<stephen(_dot_)farrell(_at_)cs(_dot_)tcd(_dot_)ie> wrote:
Say if you had to write an erratum explaining this, rather than
fixing it...what'd you say?
And (assuming such a note is useful) would it make sense to
add that to the RFC?
S.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html