Michael Thomas wrote:
Dave Crocker wrote:
Michael Thomas wrote:
Not to be too jaded, but does anybody think this will have any practical
effect whatsoever?
1. It shows legitimate due diligence. A real-world encounter suggests
an operational problem and this note attends to it.
2. It dispatches the issue from the near-term IETF agenda, thereby
relieving the working group from a hassle.
Which is to say that it will have no practical effect whatsoever.
Hmmm, so the OP meant nothing? Did that not happen? Don't you think it
can happen more?
--
HLS
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html