Jim Fenton wrote:
My personal opinion is along the lines of "Argument Con", that it is not
up to the DKIM Working Group to define a fully general policy mechanism.
I kind of like the concept, but unfortunately I haven't the time at the
moment to find out why this couldn't be somehow built on top of U/S-NAPTR
There may be good arguments for IETF to charter some work in this area,
but that's a much larger question than this WG and undoubtedly a much
more time-consuming one as well.
<sigh /> Without knowing it you might have repeated a MARID argument.
Frank
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html