On Wednesday 30 May 2007 18:22, Jim Fenton wrote:
(2) SSP record type (TXT vs. something new). Only 4 messages in discussion,
mostly saying "if you support TXT, don't bother with anything else."
Again, no clear consensus.
Agreed. There is also a view that if you go with a new RR type, don't bother
with SSP. By the time a new RR type is widely deployable, the market will
have found a different solution.
Scott K
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html